Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Anti-Marcion

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 7835

Introduction, by the American Editor.

[7825] Conditus. [See Theophilus To Autolycus, cap. x. note 1, p. 98, Vol. II. of this series. Also Ibid. p. 103, note 5. On the whole subject, Bp. Bull, Defensio Fid. Nicænæ. Vol. V. pp. 585–592.]

[7826] Condidit.

[7827] Prov. viii. 22.

[7828] Prov. 8.27.

[7829] Col. i. 15.

[7830] Ps. xlv. 1. See this reading, and its application, fully discussed in our note 5, p. 66, of the Anti-Marcion, Edin.

[7831] Ps. ii. 7.

[7832] Prov. viii. 22, 25.

[7833] John i. 3.

[7834] Ps. xxxiii. 6.

[7835] Prov. viii. 22.

[7836] Prov. 8.28.

[7837] John i. 3.

[7838] John i. 3.

[7839] Offensus.

[7840] John i. 1.

[7841] Ex. xx. 7.

[7842] Phil. ii. 6.

[7843] John iv. 24.

[7844] This doctrine of the soul’s corporeality in a certain sense is treated by Tertullian in his De Resurr. Carn. xvii., and De Anima v. By Tertullian, spirit and soul were considered identical. See our Anti-Marcion, p. 451, note 4, Edin.

[7845] [On Tertullian’s orthodoxy, here, see Kaye, p. 502.]

Chapter VIII.—Though the Son or Word of God Emanates from the Father, He is Not, Like the Emanations of Valentinus, Separable from the Father. Nor is the Holy Ghost Separable from Either. Illustrations from Nature.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0697 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>