Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Anti-Marcion

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 7844

Introduction, by the American Editor.

[7834] Ps. xxxiii. 6.

[7835] Prov. viii. 22.

[7836] Prov. 8.28.

[7837] John i. 3.

[7838] John i. 3.

[7839] Offensus.

[7840] John i. 1.

[7841] Ex. xx. 7.

[7842] Phil. ii. 6.

[7843] John iv. 24.

[7844] This doctrine of the soul’s corporeality in a certain sense is treated by Tertullian in his De Resurr. Carn. xvii., and De Anima v. By Tertullian, spirit and soul were considered identical. See our Anti-Marcion, p. 451, note 4, Edin.

[7845] [On Tertullian’s orthodoxy, here, see Kaye, p. 502.]

Chapter VIII.—Though the Son or Word of God Emanates from the Father, He is Not, Like the Emanations of Valentinus, Separable from the Father. Nor is the Holy Ghost Separable from Either. Illustrations from Nature.

[7846] “The word προβολή properly means anything which proceeds or is sent forth from the substance of another, as the fruit of a tree or the rays of the sun. In Latin, it is translated by prolatio, emissio, or editio, or what we now express by the word development. In Tertullian’s time, Valentinus had given the term a material signification. Tertullian, therefore, has to apologize for using it, when writing against Praxeas, the forerunner of the Sabellians” (Newman’s Arians, ii. 4; reprint, p. 101).

[7847] προβολή.

[7848] See Adv. Valentin. cc. xiv. xv.

[7849] Matt. xi. 27.

[7850] John i. 18.

[7851] John viii. 26.

[7852] John vi. 38.

[7853] 1 Cor. ii. 11.

[7854] John xiv. 11.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0697 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>