| << | Contents | >> |
Part Fourth
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1702
[1692] “Sitientis” in Oehler must be a misprint for “sitientes.”
[1693] There ought to be a “se” in the Latin if this be the meaning.
[1694] For “Mundator carnis seræ” ="the Cleanser of late flesh” (which would seem, if it mean anything, to mean that the flesh had to wait long for its cleansing), I have read “carnis nostræ.”
[1695] Lignum.
[1696] I have followed the disjointed style of the Latin as closely as I could here.
[1697] Here we seem to see the idea of the “limbus patrum.”
[1698] “Subiens” ="going beneath,” i.e., apparently coming beneath the walls of heaven.
[1699] i.e., a figure of the future harvest.
[1700] I have hazarded the conjecture “minutus” here for the edd.’s “munitus.” It adds one more, it is true, to our author’s false quantities, but that is a minor difficulty, while it improves (to my mind) the sense vastly.
[1701] See p. 156, supra.
[1702] See De Præscrip., cap. xxxii. vol. iii. p. 258.
II. (Or is there ought, etc., l. 136, p. 137.)
[1703] Cap. v. vol. iii. p. 525.
[1704] Christ in the Holy Sacrament, § xi. 6.
[1705] De Anima, cap. xvii.
[1706] Vol. i. p. 304.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0222 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page