<< | Contents | >> |
Part Fourth
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 305
[295] See Gen. iii. 20.
Chapter VI.—The Parallel Case of Mary Considered.
[297] [i.e., Ebion, founder of the Ebionites.]
Chapter VII.—Of the Reasons Assigned by the Apostle for Bidding Women to Be Veiled.
[299] 1 Cor. xi. 3 sqq.
Chapter VIII.—The Argument E Contrario.
[305] See Gen. ii. 23.
[307] 1 Cor. xiv. 34-35; 1 Tim. ii. 11-12.
Chapter X.—If the Female Virgins are to Be Thus Conspicuous, Why Not the Male as Well?
[309] See 1 Cor. vii. 5. Comp. ad Ux., l. i. c. viii.; de Ex. Cast., c. i.
[310] So Oehler and others. But one ms. reads “concupiscentiæ fructum” for “concupiscentiam fructus;” which would make the sense somewhat plainer, and hence is perhaps less likely to be the genuine reading.
Chapter XI.—The Rule of Veiling Not Applicable to Children.
[311] Gen. ii. 25; iii. 7 (in LXX. iii. 1, iii. 7).
[312] See ch. vii. above.
[313] See Deut. xxii. 13-21.
[314] Gen. xxiv. 64, 65. Comp. de Or., c. xxii. ad fin.
Chapter XII.—Womanhood Self-Evident, and Not to Be Concealed by Just Leaving the Head Bare.
[315] Oehler’s “immutare” appears certainly to be a misprint for “immature.”
Search Comments 
This page has been visited 0222 times.
<< | Contents | >> |
10 per page