Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

The Institutes of the Christian Religion

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 108

PREFACES

[98] See Bernard, Serm. 80, super Cantica., on the heresy of Gilbert, Bishop of Poiotiers.

[99] The French is expressed somewhat differently, “veu que l’Apostre en l’allegant de Christ, lui attribue tout ce quí est de Dieu;”–seeing the Apostle, by applying it to Christ, attributes to him everything belonging to God.

[100] The French adds, “Comme trois ruissuaux;”–like three streams.

[101] The French adds, “Comme si l’essense étoit au lieu de la personne du Pére;”–as if the essence were in place of the person of the Father.

[102] The French is somewhat differently expressed: “Car le Fils a quelque l’estre, ou il n’en a point. S’il en a, voila deux essences pour jouster l’un contre autre; s’il n’en a point, ce ne seroit qu’une ombre.” For the Son has some being, or he has none. If some, here are two essences to tilt with each other; if none, he is only a shadow.

[103] Tertullianus, lib. adv. Praxeam;–Perversitas hæ (Praxeæ scil.) se existimat meram veritatem possidere, dum unicum Deum non alias putat credendum, quam si ipsum eundemque et Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum dicat: quasi non sic quoque unas sit omnia, dum ex uno omnia, per substantæ scilicet unitatem, et nihilominus custodiatur oi0konomi/aj sacramentum, quæ unitatem in trinitatem disponit, tres dirigens, Patrem, Filium, et Spiritum sanctum. Tres autem non statu, ded gradu: nec substantia, sed forma: nec potestate, sed specie: unius autem substantiæ, et unius status, et unius potestatis: quia unus Deus, ex quo et gradus isti, formaæ et species, in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spriitus sancti deputantur. Quomodo numerum sine divisione patiuntur, procedentes tractatus demonstrabunt,:&c.

[104] Athanasuis expresses himself thus learnedly and piously:–”On this subject, though you cannot explain yourself, you are not therefore to distrust the Holy Scriptures. It is better, while hesitating through ignorance, to be silent and believe, than not to believe because you hesitate”

CHAPTER 14. IN THE CREATION OF THE WORLD, AND ALL THINGS IN IT, THE TRUE GOD DISTINGUISHED BY CERTAIN MARKS FROM FICTITIOUS GODS.

[105] Gen 18:2; 32:1, 28; Josh. 5:14; Judges 6:14; 13:10, 22.

[106] Ps. 91:11; 34:8; Gen. 16:9; 24:7; 48:16; Ex. 14:19, 28, 29; Judges 2:1, 20; 6:11; 13:10; Mt. 4:11; Luke 22:43; Mt. 28:5; Luke 24:5; Acts 1:10; 2 Kings 19:35; Isa 37:36.

[107] Dan. 10:13, 20; 12:1; Mt. 18:20; Luke 15:7; 16:22; 2 Kings 16:17; Acts 12:15.

[108] Dan 12:1; Jude 9; 1 Thess. 4:16; Dan. 10:13, 21; Luke 1:19, 26; Tobit 3:17; 5:5; Mt. 26:53; Dan. 7:10; 2 Kings 6:17; Ps. 34:7.

[109] Luke 15:10; Ps. 91:11; Mt. 4:6; Luke 4:10, 16, 22; Matt. 18:10; Acts 7:55; Gal. 3:19; Mt. 22:80; 24:36; Eph. 30:10; 1 Peter 1:12; Heb. 1:6; Ps. 97:7.

[110] 2 Cor. 4:4; John 12:31; Mt. 12:29; Eph. 2:2.

[111] Mark 16:9; Mt. 12:43; Luke 8:30.

[112] Job 1:6; 2:1; 1 Kings 22:20; 1 Sam. 16:14; 18:10; 2 Thess. 2:9, 11.

[113] 2 Cor. 4:4; Eph. 2:2; Rom. 9:22; John 8:44; 1 John 3:8.

CHAPTER 15. STATE IN WHICH MAN WAS CREATED. THE FACULTIES OF THE SOUL–THE IMAGE OF GOD–FREE WILL–ORIGINAL RIGHTEOUSNESS.

[114] On man’s first original, see Calvin against Pighius; and on the immortality of the soul, see Calvin’s Psychopannychia and Instructio adv. Libertinos, c. 9 11, 12. It is curious to see how widely the opinion of Pliny differs from the Christian doctrine: “Omnibus a suprema die eadem quæ ante primam; hic magis a morte sensus ullus aut corpori aut animæ quam ante natales. Eadem enim vanitas in futurum etiam se propagat et in mortis quoque tempora ipsa sibi vitam mentitur.”–Plin. Hist. Nat. lib. 7 c. 56.

[115] Job 4:19; 2 Cor. 5:4; 2 Pet. 1:13-14; 2 Cor. 5:10; 7:1; 1 Pet. 2:25; 1:9; 2:11; Heb. 13:17; 2 Cor. 1:23; Mt. 10:28; Luke 12:5; Heb 12:9; Luke 16:22; 2 Cor. 5:6; 8; Acts 23:8.

[116] Ovid, Metam. Lib. I.–Dryden’s Translation.

[117] As to Osiander’s absurd fancy, see Book 2. cap 12. sec. 5, squ. In Rom. 8:3, Christ is said to have been sent by the Father in the likeness of sinful flesh, but nowhere is Adam said to have been formed in the likeness of Christ’s future flesh, although Tertullian somewhere says so.

[118] See Aug. Lib. de Trin. 10, et Lib. de Civit. Dei, 11. See farther, Calvin, in Psycho pannychia et Comment. in Genes.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0561 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>