<< | Contents | >> |
The Diatessaron of Tatian
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 152
[145] The text is indistinct in the Vat. ms. The reading seems to be conflate, the doublets being when it was, which is the reading of Ibn-at-Tayyib’s Commentary, and on.
[152] Lit. described (cf. § ii. 46).
[162] Or, should.
Search Comments 
This page has been visited 0343 times.
<< | Contents | >> |
10 per page