| << | Contents | >> |
The Diatessaron of Tatian
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2377
[2369] Ciasca’s Arabic text (apparently following Borg. ms.) has till he before came. This is unsupported by any of the three Syriac texts, although they differ from one another. Perhaps till and came should be transposed. The translation would then be as given in the text above; but this rendering may also be obtained according to § 54, 1, note.
[2371] The Syriac word used means both wounds and strokes.
[2372] The Arabic word is a favourite of the translator’s, and may therefore be original. One cannot help thinking, however, that it is a clerical error for mounted (cf. Cur. and Sin.).
[2379] In Syriac could and found are represented by the same word. The Arabic translator has chosen the wrong one.
[2382] See note, § 11, 11.
[2386] See note above, on § 34, 46.
[2387] i.e., Gentiles.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0343 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page