<< | Contents | >> |
The Diatessaron of Tatian
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 50
[40] Attention was called to these by Profs. Isaac H. Hall and R. J. H. Gottheil (Journ. of Bibl. Lit., x., 153 ff.; xi., 68 ff.); then by Prof. J. R. Harris (Contemp. Rev., Aug., 1895, p. 271 ff., and, more fully, Fragments of the Com. of Ephr. Syr. on the Diatess., London, 1895) and by Goussen (Studia Theologica, fasc. i., Lips., 1895).
[41] Prof. Harris promises an edition of this commentary.
[42] Harris, Fragments, p. 14, where the Syriac text is quoted.
[43] Bib. Or., ii., 159 f. Most of them are repeated again by Bar Hebræus (d. 1286), although some confusion is produced by his interweaving some phrases from Eusebius of Cæsarea. (Bib. Or., i., 57 f., and a longer quotation in English in Contemp. Rev., Aug., 1895, p. 274 f.)
[44] Lagarde’s statement (Nachrichten von der Königl. Gesellsch. der Wiss., etc., zu Göttingen, 1891, No. 4, p. 153) that a ms. had been discovered, appears to have been unfounded. Prof. Rahlfs of Göttingen kindly tells me that he believes this is so.
[45] Migne, Patrol. græc., tom. lxxxiii., col. 369, 372.
[46] Published at Venice in 1836.
[47] The two Armenian mss. are dated a.d. 1195.
[48] Evangelii Concordantis Expositio, facta a S. Ephraemo (Ven., 1876).
[49] Forschungen zur Geschichte des neutestamentlichen Kanons, I. Theil.
[50] Edited by Ernestus Ranke, Marb. and Lips., 1868.
[51] For other forms of the Diatessaron, of no critical importance, see S. Hemphill, The Diatessaron of Tatian (London, 1888), Appendix D and the refs. there.
[52] Further references, chiefly repetitions in one form or another of the statements we have quoted, may be found in a convenient form in Harnack, Gesch. d. altchrist. Lit. bis. Euseb., 493–496; cf. also the works mentioned by Hill (op. cit.) p. 378 f.
[53] cf. the words of Aphraates, senior contemporary of Ephraem: “As it is written in the beginning of the Gospel of our Vivifier: In the beginning was the Word.” (Patrol. Syr., pars i., tom. i., 21, lines 17–19).
[54] Nachrichten von der Königl. Gesellsch. der Wiss., etc., March 17, 1886, No. 4, p. 151 ff.
[55] See notes to § 1, 81, and § 4, 29.
[56] See note to § 55, 17.
[57] The Armenian version of Ephraem is supposed to date from the fifth century.
[58] Mai, Script. vet. nov. Coll., x., 191.
[59] Overbeck, S. Ephraemi, etc., Opera Selecta, p. 220, lines 3–5.
[60] Phillips, Doct. Add., p. 36, 15–17 [E. Tr. p. 34].
Search Comments 
This page has been visited 0343 times.
<< | Contents | >> |
10 per page