| << | Contents | >> |
The Diatessaron of Tatian
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 54
[44] Lagarde’s statement (Nachrichten von der Königl. Gesellsch. der Wiss., etc., zu Göttingen, 1891, No. 4, p. 153) that a ms. had been discovered, appears to have been unfounded. Prof. Rahlfs of Göttingen kindly tells me that he believes this is so.
[45] Migne, Patrol. græc., tom. lxxxiii., col. 369, 372.
[46] Published at Venice in 1836.
[47] The two Armenian mss. are dated a.d. 1195.
[48] Evangelii Concordantis Expositio, facta a S. Ephraemo (Ven., 1876).
[49] Forschungen zur Geschichte des neutestamentlichen Kanons, I. Theil.
[50] Edited by Ernestus Ranke, Marb. and Lips., 1868.
[51] For other forms of the Diatessaron, of no critical importance, see S. Hemphill, The Diatessaron of Tatian (London, 1888), Appendix D and the refs. there.
[52] Further references, chiefly repetitions in one form or another of the statements we have quoted, may be found in a convenient form in Harnack, Gesch. d. altchrist. Lit. bis. Euseb., 493–496; cf. also the works mentioned by Hill (op. cit.) p. 378 f.
[53] cf. the words of Aphraates, senior contemporary of Ephraem: “As it is written in the beginning of the Gospel of our Vivifier: In the beginning was the Word.” (Patrol. Syr., pars i., tom. i., 21, lines 17–19).
[54] Nachrichten von der Königl. Gesellsch. der Wiss., etc., March 17, 1886, No. 4, p. 151 ff.
[55] See notes to § 1, 81, and § 4, 29.
[56] See note to § 55, 17.
[57] The Armenian version of Ephraem is supposed to date from the fifth century.
[58] Mai, Script. vet. nov. Coll., x., 191.
[59] Overbeck, S. Ephraemi, etc., Opera Selecta, p. 220, lines 3–5.
[60] Phillips, Doct. Add., p. 36, 15–17 [E. Tr. p. 34].
[61] Moesinger, Evang. Concord., etc., p. xi.
[62] The latest discussion of the question whether this really was Tatian is Mr. Rendel Harris’s article in the Contemp. Rev., Aug., 1895.
[63] Best ed. by Eduard Schwartz, in Texte und Untersuchungen, IV. Band, Heft 1.
[64] “Tatian’s Diatessaron and the Analysis of the Pentateuch,” Journ. of Bibl. Lit., vol. ix., 1890, pt. ii., 201–215.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0343 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page