| << | Contents | >> |
Irenæus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2706
Introductory Note to Irenæus Against Heresies
[2696] Ex. xiii. 2; Luke ii. 23.
[2697] Not as being born of it, but as fecundating it, and so producing a manifold offspring. See below.
[2702] Luke xiv. 27. It will be observed that the quotations of Scripture made by Irenæus often vary somewhat from the received text. This may be due to various reasons—his quoting from memory; his giving the texts in the form in which they were quoted by the heretics; or, as Harvey conjectures, from his having been more familiar with a Syriac version of the New Testament than with the Greek original.
[2706] Hence Stauros was called by the agricultural name Carpistes, as separating what was gross and material from the spiritual and heavenly.
[2708] Gal. vi. 14. The words ἐν μηδενί do not occur in the Greek text.
[2709] Billius renders, “of their opinion.”
[2710] The punctuation and rendering are here slightly doubtful.
[2711] This term, though Tertullian declares himself to have been ignorant of its derivation, was evidently formed from the Hebrew word חָכְמָה—chockmah, wisdom.
[2712] The reader will observe that light and fulness are the exact correlatives of the darkness and vacuity which have just been mentioned.
[2713] As above stated (ii. 3), the Gnostics held that form and figure were due to the male, substance to the female parent.
[2714] The Valentinian Stauros was the boundary fence of the Pleroma beyond which Christ extended himself to assist the enthymesis of Sophia.
[2715] The peculiar gnosis which Nous received from his father, and communicated to the other Æons.
[2716] Probably corresponding to the Hebrew יהוה, Jehovah.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0428 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page