Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Irenæus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2968

Introductory Note to Irenæus Against Heresies

[2958] [Comp. cap. xxv. 3.]

[2959] We here follow the amended version proposed by the Benedictine editor.

[2960] A promise never fulfilled: comp. book iii. 12, and Euseb., Hist. Eccl., v. 8.

[2961] [Rev. xii. 9.]

Chapter XXVIII.—Doctrines of Tatian, the Encratites, and others.

[2962] [The whole casuistical system of the Trent divines, De Matrimonio, proceeds on this principle: marriage is licensed evil.]

Chapter XXIX.—Doctrines of various other Gnostic sects, and especially of the Barbeliotes or Borborians.

[2963] Harvey supposes this name to be derived from two Syriac words, meaning “God in a Tetrad.” Matter again derives it from two Hebrew words, denoting “Daughter of the Lord.”

[2964] Both the text and meaning are here altogether doubtful.

[2965] Harvey refers to the cabbalistic books in explanation of this and the following names, but their meanings are very uncertain.

[2966] Various explanations of this word have been proposed, but its signification remains altogether doubtful.

[2967] Ex. xx. 5; Isa. xlv. 5, 6.

Chapter XXX.—Doctrines of the Ophites and Sethians.

[2968] The punctuation is here difficult and doubtful.

[2969] The probable meaning of this and the following names is thus given by Harvey: Ialdabaoth, Lord God of the Fathers; Iao, Jehovah; Oreus, Light; Astanphæus, Crown; Sabaoth, of course, means Hosts; Adoneus, Lord; and Eloeus, God. All the names are derived from the cabbalistic theology of the Jews.

[2970] Hence their name of Ophites, from ὄφις, a serpent.

[2971] The Latin has evertisse, implying that thus Nous was more degraded.

[2972] Gen. i. 26.

[2973] That is, from Ialdabaoth, etc. [Philastr. (ut supra), Oehler, i. p. 38.]

[2974] There is constant reference in this section to rabbinical conceits and follies.

[2975] A name probably derived from the Hebrew נערה, girl, but of the person referred to we know nothing.

[2976] We here follow the emendation of Grabe: the defection of Prunicus is intended.

[2977] The Latin here is “ex quibus,” and the meaning is exceedingly obscure. Harvey thinks it is the representative ἐξ ὦν (χρόνων) in the Greek, but we prefer to refer it to “Judæos,” as above. The next sentence seems unintelligible: but, according to Harvey, “each deified day of the week had his ministering prophets.”

[2978] The common text inserts “et incorruptibili Æone,” but this seems better rejected as a glossarial interpolation.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0428 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>