Minucius Felix

Footnotes

^[1744] Otherwise, “we are contained and bound together.”

^[1745] [These very accusations, reduced back to Christian language, show that much of the Creed was, in fact, known to the heathen at this period.]

Chapter XI.—Argument: Besides Asserting the Future Conflagration of the Whole World, They Promise Afterwards the Resurrection of Our Bodies: and to the Righteous an Eternity of Most Blessed Life; To the Unrighteous, of Extreme Punishment.

^[1746] [1 Tim. iv. 7.]

^[1747] “And I have already shown, without any trouble,” is another reading.

^[1748] Otherwise, “without a body or with.”

^[1749] Otherwise, “too credulous.”

Chapter XII.—Argument: Moreover, What Will Happen to the Christians Themselves After Death, May Be Anticipated from the Fact that Even Now They are Destitute of All Means, and are Afflicted with the Heaviest Calamities and Miseries.

^[1750] Otherwise, “while you consider, while you are yet alive, poor wretches, what is threatening after death.”

^[1751] Some read, “with shivering.”

Chapter XIII.—Argument: Cæcilius at Length Concludes that the New Religion is to Be Repudiated; And that We Must Not Rashly Pronounce Upon Doubtful Matters.

^[1752] This is otherwise read, “Academic Pyrrhonists.”

^[1753] Cicero, de Natura Deorum, i. 22.

Chapter XIV.—Argument: With Something of the Pride of Self-Satisfaction, Cæcilius Urges Octavius to Reply to His Arguments; And Minucius with Modesty Answers Him, that He Must Not Exult at His Own by No Means Ordinary Eloquence, and at the Harmonious Variety of His Address.

^[1754] “Plautinæ prosapiæ.” The expression is intended as a reproach against the humble occupations of many of the Christian professors. Plautus is said, when in need, to have laboured at a baker’s hand-mill. Cæcilius tells Octavius that he may be the first among the millers, but he is the last among the philosophers. Stieber proposes “Christianorum” instead of “pistorum”—“Christians” instead of “millers.”

Chapter XV.—Argument: Cæcilius Retorts Upon Minucius, with Some Little Appearance of Being Hurt, that He is Foregoing the Office of a Religious Umpire, When He is Weakening the Force of His Argument. He Says that It Should Be Left to Octavius to Confute All that He Had Advanced.

^[1755] Scil. “Octavius.”

Chapter XVI.—Argument: Octavius Arranges His Reply, and Trusts that He Shall Be Able to Dilute the Bitterness of Reproach with the River of Truthful Words. He Proceeds to Weaken the Individual Arguments of Cæcilius. Nobody Need Complain that the Christians, Unlearned Though They May Be, Dispute About Heavenly Things Because It is Not the Authority of Him Who Argues, But the Truth of the Argument Itself, that Should Be Considered.

^[1756] Some read, “in the light.”

^[1757] Cæcilius.

^[1758] Otherwise “his.”

^[1759] Some read “cavillaverit” instead of “vacillaverit,” which would give the sense, “make captious objections.”

^[1760] This is otherwise given “certainty,” which helps the meaning of the passage.

^[1761] Otherwise, “Far from his guileless subtlety is so crafty a trickery.” But the readings are very unsettled.

Chapter XVII.—Argument: Man Ought Indeed to Know Himself, But This Knowledge Cannot Be Attained by Him Unless He First of All Acknowledges the Entire Scope of Things, and God Himself. And from the Constitution and Furniture of the World Itself, Every One Endowed with Reason Holds that It Was Established by God, and is Governed and Administered by Him.

^[1762] Some read, “the Lord God.”

^[1763] Scil. “atoms.”

^[1764] According to some, “point out” or “indicate.”

10 per page

Search Comments

This page has been visited 0026 times.

Contents