| << | Contents | >> |
Against Celsus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 3271
[3262] [“Celsus quotes the writings of the disciples of Jesus concerning His life, as possessing unquestioned authority; and that these were the four canonical Gospels is proved both by the absence of all evidence to the contrary, and by the special facts which he brings forward. And not only this, but both Celsus and Porphyry appear to have been acquainted with the Pauline Epistles” (Westcott’s History of the Canon of the New Testament, pp. 464, 465, 137, 138, 401, 402). See also infra, cap. lxxiv. S.]
[3263] [Luke xxi. 20. S.]
[3264] ὅσα περὶ τούτου καὶ παρὰ τῷ Παύλῳ πεφιλοσόφηται.
[3265] Cf. Plato, de Rep., x. p. 614.
[3266] Cf. Plin., Nat. Hist., vii. c. 52.
[3269] Οὐ μόνον οὖν οὐχ ὁ νεκρὸς ἀθάνατος, ἀλλ᾽ οὐδ᾽ ὁ πρὸ τοῦ νεκροῦ ᾽Ιησοῦς ὁ σύνθετος ἀθάνατος ἦν, ὅς γε ἔμελλε τεθνήξεσθαι.
[3271] οὕτως ἀθρόως.
[3272] εὐτελέσι.
[3273] ἀργὸς λόγος.
[3274] Euripid., Phœnissæ, 18–20.
[3275] ἀντὶ τοῦ ἕσται.
[3277] ἁλῶν καὶ τραπέζης.
[3278] Archilochus.
[3279] Guietus would expunge these words as “inept.”
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0139 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page