Anti-Marcion

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 7289

Introduction, by the American Editor.

^[7279] Ceteris passivum.

^[7280] Acts i. 11.

^[7281] Tantundem.

^[7282] Tantummodo.

^[7283] I quote the Ed. London, 1739, Vol. V., p. 249.

VI. On the Resurrection of the Flesh.

^[7284] See Bp. Kaye, On Tertullian, p. 256. A full examination of the tenets of these Gnostic heretics occurs in our author’s Treatise against Marcion. An able review of Tertullian’s line of thought in this work on the resurrection occurs in Neander’s Antignostikus, Bohn’s translation, ii. 478–486. [There is a decisive ebullition of Montanistic fanaticism in cap. xi., and in the second chapter there is a reference to the De Carne Christi. Date this treatise circa a.d. 208.]

Chapter I.—The Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Body Brought to Light by the Gospel. The Faintest Glimpses of Something Like It Occasionally Met with in Heathenism. Inconsistencies of Pagan Teaching.

^[7285] Fiducia.

^[7286] Parentant.

^[7287] Pro temporibus esculentorum.

^[7288] Etiam desiderar.

^[7289] Cum crematis cremat.

^[7290] Adhuc proxime: “Christianæ scilicet doctrinæ.” Oehler.

^[7291] Recidivatum.

^[7292] Corporalem.

Chapter II.—The Jewish Sadducees a Link Between the Pagan Philosophers and the Heretics on This Doctrine. Its Fundamental Importance Asserted. The Soul Fares Better Than the Body, in Heretical Estimation, as to Its Future State. Its Extinction, However, Was Held by One Lucan.

^[7293] Apud Deum.

^[7294] Sciemus.